Breaking News English

A new bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat says beef production damages the environment about ten bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat more than pork, lamb, or chicken production. Scientists said bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat need 28 times more land and 11 times more bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat than pigs, sheep or chickens. They also produce a lot of bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat gas after they eat. Food like potatoes, bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat, and rice need 160 times less land and produce 11 times bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat greenhouse gases than beef. The bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat said the farming of animals and crops is a big bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat of global warming. Farming causes 15 per cent of all greenhouse gases. About bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat of this is from animals.

One scientist said we could reduce our bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat footprint by eating less beef. Professor Mark Sutton said cutting down on beef is bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat for the environment than using the car bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat. He also said eating less beef means we could give the bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat that cows eat to feed bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat people. This sounds bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat, but many bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat do not want to try it. Professor Sutton said governments should think about this bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat. He said consumers also needed to think bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat about what they eat. He said that eating less meat, bettercarboncarefullycausecowsespeciallygovernmentsgreenhousehalflessmorescientistssimplestarvingstudytimeswaterwheat less beef, is good for the environment.